The Criminal Justice Blog

Home » AMIMB » The paralysis of too many priorities.

The paralysis of too many priorities.


Sat immediately behind the new Secretary of State at the Justice Select Committee (@CommonsJustice) on 07 September, I registered a lot of awkwardness that was beyond mere nervousness felt by many a new joiner.


Thatcher Room, 07 Sept 2016


Just like Gove’s debut in front of the same Committee where he rattled on about “we’re reviewing it” (yes, I was there for that one too), Liz Truss (@trussliz) talked largely about the formulating of “plans” but on the day said nothing about tangible actions she will take.

How many more reviews do we need?

Has Truss inherited a poisoned chalice passed from one SoS to the next? Her department has a huge accumulated mess to sort out and doesn’t know what to do about it. Is she wondering what to tackle first? The paralysis of too many priorities?

Her critics say she’s doing things wrong. Look at it for yourself and you’ll see some of the priorities she is confronted with:

  • Extremism and radicalisation in prison
  • Violence against other offenders and against prison staff
  • Over population
  • Under staffing of prisons
  • Death in custody
  • Drugs and drones
  • Education and purposeful activity
  • Resettlement and homelessness on release

You would think her advisors would know what the order of priorities are. They don’t, or if they do, they obviously prefer the relative safety of “talking shop” over the tough task of taking concrete action on these priorities.

The key question people are asking is has she actually got the shoulders for the job; she has the high office and gilded robe of the Lord Chancellor but does she have the support of those working within the criminal justice system?

Soon after her appointment from Defra to Ministry of Justice, Liz Truss paid token visits to two prisons but cannot be expected to become an instant expert on the prison system.

What other mess does the SoS need to deal with?

The system of prison monitoring is in a mess. The IMB Secretariat is in utter disarray. They say they have policies and procedures but don’t always follow them themselves. For the most part, IMBs are doing their own thing. There’s no real accountability anymore. It’s a disgrace and it’s deplorable that it’s been allowed to get as bad as it has.

Faith Spear

Faith Spear

For my critique of prison reform and Independent Monitor Boards, I’ve been put through two MOJ investigations. Each one takes away a little piece of me. But for me it’s always been about the issues. That’s why they can’t and won’t shut me up.

The message of prison reform has become urgent and has to get to the top. If no one else will step up and if it falls to me to take it then so be it.

No accountability anymore? Give me an example.

You want an example? Here’s one of many: At HMP Garth, the IMB Chair issued a Notice To Prisoners 048/2016 dated May 2016 without the authority to do so, and apparently without the Board agreeing it. The Chair acted unilaterally outside of governance. I found out about it because a copy of that prison notice was sent to me as it happened to be about the article Whistle Blower Without a Whistle that I’d written for The Prison Handbook 2016 that the IMB Garth Chair was pin-pointing, (accusing me of a “rant” whilst both his prison notice and covering letter were dripping with distain).

I’m still standing by all I said in my Whistleblower article even though writing it has been at a high personal cost. In all candour, any pride I may have had in writing it has been completely sucked away from me. It’s back to the bare metal. The inconvenient truth of what I wrote remains. Readers will find that my main themes also feature prominently in the findings of the report by Karen Page Associates, commissioned by the MOJ at a cost to the taxpayer of £18,500.

An invite I received from Brian Guthrie to the forthcoming AGM of Association of Members of IMB says it all. It read:

“From the Chair Christopher Padfield
AMIMB – the immediate future
IMB needs a voice. We believe that without AMIMB this voice will not be heard. AMIMB intends to raise its voice, but needs the support of our members.
An outline plan for the immediate future of AMIMB will be put up for discussion at the forthcoming AGM (11 October 2016 at 2 Temple Place). It aims to respond both to the main needs and opportunities, and to the practicalities of the current situation.

The greatest need, as the executive committee of the AMIMB sees it, is to achieve a public voice for Independent Monitoring Boards – to let the British public know what we, as monitors, think about prison and immigration detention policy and practice in England and Wales and the impact this has on the men, women and children detained; to achieve some public recognition for the role of IMBs; in short to speak out about what we hear and see. We have urged the National Council to do this itself, but to no avail. In character, the NC propose as their contribution to the Parliamentary Justice Select Committee’s current consultation on Prison Reform, a response to a procedural question: ‘are existing mechanisms for … independent scrutiny of prisons fit for purpose?’ If the NC cannot or will not speak out, AMIMB should.”

Mr Padfield has served as IMB Chairman at HMP Bedford but to my knowledge has never been suspended pending investigation by the Prisons Minister like I was for speaking out on such things.

And therein lays the dilemma: whereas the official line is to encourage monitors to speak out, the reprisals levelled at you when you actually do are still shocking.

Is this what happens to women who use their voice?

People want you to get back in the box.
To shut up.
To go away.

The IMB doesn’t need a makeover; that would only hide most of the systemic problems behind filler and veneer. So rebranding clearly isn’t going to be the answer any more than putting lipstick on a pig.

People who think I want to abolish the IMB have totally misjudged me and the situation. I don’t want to abolish it. Far from it. I want the IMB to perform like it was set up to under OPCAT and to be all it should be as part of our NPM.

The clue is in the name: Independent. Monitoring. Board.

Have you noticed that the MOJ is haemorrhaging people at the moment?

Maybe Liz Truss could use that as an opportunity to enlist the help of those who do give a damn about the conditions in which people are held in custody and who do have a clue about strategies to stem radicalisation in prison, minimise violence, reduce prison over population, have the right staff and staffing levels, reduce death in custody, counter drones and drug misuse, revitalise education and purposeful activity, and last but not least, resettle and house people after their time in custody.
Join the conversation on Twitter @fmspear @trussliz @CommonsJustice #prisons #reform #IMB #AMIMB #SpeakUp


First published 17 Sept 2016.

Edited 18 Sept 2016.



  1. Alison says:

    If they tackle the over crowding situation a lot of the other issues would become easier to manage. The main way to stop the overcrowding is to stop judges and magistrates sentencing anyone to jail unless it’s for a serious violent offence. The second way is to release any IPP or lifer more than a year over tariff. Both would immediately solve the overcrowding issue and it would be easier to resume a normal schedule which would help reduce some of the other issues.

    Even if you hire a bunch of new people to bring the staffing levels back up to a sane and sensible level it won’t necessarily help if the new staff are all young, immature and inexperienced as a lot of the new intake are as these are the only people who will take the job on at the crap salary currently offered. You need to get back as many of the experienced officers Grayling dumped as possible and pay them decently.

    Healthcare needs to be radically revamped so it is the same quality as people get in the community and mental healthcare needs to be adequately resourced and staffed so anyone who needs help gets immediate high quality help. I think this would help enormously with the levels of death in custody

    Education needs to go all the way from level one through to post grad and funding supplied to anyone who wants to educate themselves. Ridiculous to stop funding anything over level 2 and then carp on about education being a priority. Plus education offerings need to be a good wide range of academic and practical skills that are actually of use in today’s world and not the world of last century. It also needs to be the best paying gig in a prison so people are motivated to engage instead of the worst.

    In my experience corrupt staff are the biggest threat regarding drugs getting into prisons. Stuff rarely comes in via drones or visitors. If the MoJ actually admitted this they could then take the necessary steps to deal with the issue but as long as they keep pretending that staff are not the main way drugs and other contraband get in then the problem will remain. Also if each cell had an in cell phone and calls could be made at the same price as outside the need for illicit mobiles would virtually disappear.

    Probation needs to go back to the advise, befriend and assist ethos rather than trying to manage some imagined risk level. They also need to have imposed on them an obligation to source proper accommodation for anyone leaving prison and govt needs to fund this properly. They also need to look at the whole disclosure thing. Once a licence is finished you should not have to disclose a conviction unless for certain occupations.

    Not sure what to do about extremism and radicalisation in prison because whatever is tried once people are in prison seems to not work. More studies into why people get radicalised in the first place need to be done so that you can then get a sense of what might actually work to stop people getting radicalised long before they get to prison

    • faithspear says:

      I wholeheartedly agree with each of your points. It’s like listening to me! Thank you for commenting. What did you think of my latest blog then (21 Nov 2016)?

      • Overcrowding is only the tip of the iceberg, under funding really is an issue, under staffing, lack of support for staff and residents…. I could go on and on….. I support the POA whole heartedly, I feel that the only way to highlight the dangers of the prison system is for the POA to take drastic action and disrupt the whole system, thus creating a media feeding frenzy.
        Yes, overcrowding needs addressing, yes the drug culture is out of control, yes yes yes, I could go into a major rant….. But, it’s time for change….

  2. Peter Woolf says:

    Absolutely agree, Ms Truss has been, thus far, the silent minister, the occasional mumble has been heard across the pews of power, but nothing of substance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: